Abbas wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything Derozan
Collapse
X
-
Abbas wrote: View Postthat isnt negative, that's a dash
Joey ur looking at the numbers i;ll average next season when i get drafted by the raptors
I'll play the 4 and win not only ROY but also MVP and FMYP
Your Welcome raptor fans around the world
i'll hit my prime at 29 and average
44p/14a/12r/7s/3b on 81%FG/58%3FG/99.99999%FT
I'll win 15 rings with raptors in my 19 years in the league
and i'll win 19 straight DPOTY
Comment
-
Demar and Durant chilling at OVO fest
Demar and drake already recruiting Durant lol the 3'Ds
https://twitter.com/Em_Cats/status/6...128320/photo/1
https://twitter.com/Em_Cats/status/628373276755128320
and can someone post that tweet i posted
thxAbbas wrote:
First of all i was my own source
Comment
-
So @KDTrey5 at #OVOFest2015 wearing a @DAVIDprice14 jersey with @DeMar_DeRozan #GoJaysGo #rtz pic.twitter.com/dDdRA3f2bM
— Emma Katz (@Em_Cats) August 4, 2015
Comment
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostThe thing is everything MU has done says that his building around the backcourt.
If that pick coming from Denver/Knicks is top 5, I can see one of Lowry, DD or JV being packaged with it for whomever he is targeting.
Comment
-
JWash wrote: View PostIdk why people think that keeping a player means you're building around them.
You can also build on top of players like damn.
Was Golden State building around David Lee when they signed him in 2010?
Why keep a player whose skill set does not even fit into the mold of a player who is generally a second or third starter beside said superstar as he cannot shoot from distance and is generally a very poor defender.
Why keep a player whose net production is essentially nil?
Why keep a player when their trade value is currently high and you can replace their production with a rebalancing of the offense structure and add a player that while may not produce as much individually, their addition would allow for the overall team offense/defense to either maintain or possible improve?
Comment
-
Snooch wrote: View Postwhy keep a player best served as either your 2nd or 3rd starter or sixth man in hopes of adding a superstar piece on top of him, especially when said player would cost superstar money?
Why keep a player whose skill set does not even fit into the mold of a player who is generally a second or third starter beside said superstar as he cannot shoot from distance and is generally a very poor defender.
Why keep a player whose net production is essentially nil?
Why keep a player when their trade value is currently high and you can replace their production with a rebalancing of the offense structure and add a player that while may not produce as much individually, their addition would allow for the overall team offense/defense to either maintain or possible improve?
Comment
-
Mindlessness wrote: View PostMy reaction to your previous post!
Let's face it, you're DeLusional about DeMar DeRozan!
a) demar is a net nil producer on the court as per offensive and defensive ratings
b) demar will need to be paid huge money reducing opportunity to land a guy like durant
c) demar's best attributes(getting to the line) is reduced by not having as many offensive opportunities
d) same as above but with a restructured offense
e) demars particular skillset is not one that would allow it to be effective as a secondary or third option as he is poorly efficient, is a poor shooter(especially from range) and a subpar defender)
are now called delusional.
OK, Sure.
Comment
-
lol Snooch's bullshit arguments make me laugh so hard, the way Jwash is getting into his head ahahahaha
this is like a comedy book
Derozan is the successful son
JWash is the parent figure
Snooch is the extremely jealous siblingAbbas wrote:
First of all i was my own source
Comment
-
Snooch wrote: View Postwhy keep a player best served as either your 2nd or 3rd starter or sixth man in hopes of adding a superstar piece on top of him, especially when said player would cost superstar money?
Comment
Comment