lewro wrote:
View Post
I don't think we've seen anything from Poeltl to say he's a better fit defensively. He could be, but evidence is still pending and he could just as well end up much worse.
Most teams would be better served if they could trade one guy into two different roles but that's part of the point, finding a "Chandler type" and a "Millsap type" is hard enough separately let alone together. There simply aren't many real options out there that would be better for us. Short of trading JV for Davis or KAT, I'm not sure I see any actual players (not just hypothetical player types) that would make much sense.
If the plan is to go in on this group, trading Poeltl would make much more sense.
If the plan is long term, trading Lowry would make more sense than dealing JV.
JVs offence is underutilized now, but his rebounding is a big part of our success. As Lowry ages, JVs role of offence should grow and we do need that.
Comment