Legacy League Draft Thread

[DogeLover1234]

Get it right the first time

Once all the picks are in, will do up the bracket (Mack vs Apollo in the avatar challenge is locked in) and then send out final instructions with the match ups.

I was going to drop MJ for Powell because i figure the voters will like a team with Powell and Bruno.

Ooops just gave away my last pick! /s

[Joey]

One of my favourites of all-time

Me too. First jersey I ever owned. Was planning on going a different route for my 7th pick, figuring he would be long gone, but he just kempt showing up on my board .. had to take him.

[Axel]

I will be selecting ...




Shawn Kemp

I was debating Kemp with 2 other bigs. You better hope my other guys are still available for my next pick.

My issue with Kemp was that his statistical best was when he was "leading" those awful Cleveland teams. Then he got fat.

[Apollo]

....... Andre Kirilenko would have a HUGE issue with you saying that .. Lol AK47 was a monster in his prime.

Wasn't he poor under pressure though? He had some issues besides his injury problems if I remember correctly.

He posted pretty stats in his prime years though.

EDIT: Make sure he gets his minutes.
http://www.sltrib.com/jazz/ci_5727873


Sent from my Note 3 using Tapatalk

[Joey]

My issue with Kemp was that his statistical best was when he was "leading" those awful Cleveland teams. Then he got fat.

Not quite true.

93'-94' with Seattle his 6.0 DWS is up there amongst the absolute best of all time.
And while he did technically achieve a slightly higher PER one season with Cleveland, he managed a steady stream of 6 seasons at 20+ PER, peaking his same year as the 6.0DWS with a 22.9 PER; 18 ppg, 11rpg, 2.1bpg, 1.8spg, 54%FG, 74%FT.

And then Crack happened.

[Mack North]

Not quite true.

93'-94' with Seattle his 6.0 DWS is up there amongst the absolute best of all time.
And while he did technically achieve a slightly higher PER one season with Cleveland, he managed a steady stream of 6 seasons at 20+ PER, peaking his same year as the 6.0DWS with a 22.9 PER; 18 ppg, 11rpg, 2.1bpg, 1.8spg, 54%FG, 74%FT.

And then Crack happened.

Crack is a helluva drug.

He was my favorite player in the 90's with Timmy H. Was hoping they dropped.

[DogeLover1234]

Me too. First jersey I ever owned. Was planning on going a different route for my 7th pick, figuring he would be long gone, but he just kempt showing up on my board .. had to take him.

Nice one! I honestly thought you had already taken him a few rounds ago, otherwise i would have spent a lot of time thinking about him! Great pick.

[Apollo]

We need more rounds. We're neglecting a very important detail: coaching.

The way it's shaping up all those teams that drafted last in the crucial round one would be looking at first cracks at coaches in a snaking format. There would need to be a rule that any player drafted can't be a coach as well.

Thoughts?

Sent from my Note 3 using Tapatalk

[DogeLover1234]

We need more rounds. We're neglecting a very important detail: coaching.

The way it's shaping up all those teams that drafted last in the crucial round one would be looking at first cracks at coaches in a snaking format.

Thoughts?

Sent from my Note 3 using Tapatalk

The problem with adding coaches at this point is that people would have drafted differently. For example I would not have waited this long for a coach. I like this idea for potential future drafts but not for this year. Also keep in mind that there are more great players than there are great coaches.

[Axel]

We need more rounds. We're neglecting a very important detail: coaching.

The way it's shaping up all those teams that drafted last in the crucial round one would be looking at first cracks at coaches in a snaking format. There would need to be a rule that any player drafted can't be a coach as well.

Thoughts?

Sent from my Note 3 using Tapatalk

Technically we are the coaches, since we set our line ups and present the strategies for the voting masses.

[Apollo]

Ok. Fair enough.

The problem with adding coaches at this point is that people would have drafted differently. For example I would not have waited this long for a coach. I like this idea for potential future drafts but not for this year. Also keep in mind that there are more great players than there are great coaches.

A good coach adapts to his roster. For example the Bulls and Lakers were totally different yet Phil won many times with both because he was outstanding as a coach.

Sent from my Note 3 using Tapatalk

[raptors999]

PlanetMars roster seems weird but with Pop or PJax running a triangle it might be good

[Joey]

I got a LONG way until my next pick .. Ugh... Lol

[BobLoblaw]

Snooch, the real issue I have with your team is that I believe you do not have a real true SF. But yeah, nabbing Russel was your best move.

Rick Barry is an elite SF. AK47 is good too, although he's a bit harder to fit offensively as a 3, but he could defend 3s.

[Bonus Jonas]

Wasn't ready for this pick after Rashard got taken, give me a couple minutes guys