What else is there to consider? Can you provide a source of more info because we're speaking to what we have available.
See the thing is the police said there was no harassment, yet it's still gone to trail. This is where free speech debate enters. If the police said there was evidence of harassment, it was clearly identifiable, then there would be no discussion of free speech.
I agree, harassment shouldn't be protected by free speech. Harassment is a charge that must be proved with evidence though. Again, if you have more than what we're going on then please provide it. It would be helpful.
Whether she's defended free speech or not is irrelevant because no one is suggesting she's intentionally attacking free speech. What is being suggested is that this case has no evidence, just someone who's saying she FEELS harassed and wants someone else to pay criminally for making her feel that way(am I understanding the case correctly here?). People have all sorts of feelings triggered by all sorts of things. How does one measure a feeling and what about a feeling should see someone locked up?
The arguments I've provided has focused on a single concept, does a lack of evidence mean there is a threat to free speech should such a case rule in the accuser's favour? You've attempted to derail the discussion a couple times now calling people sexist and other things. You've suggested if a man finds a woman attractive there is something wrong with that. Should we apologize for not taking your view and providing a different perspective? Also what does it have to do with the thread?
Sent from my Note 3 using Tapatalk
See the thing is the police said there was no harassment, yet it's still gone to trail. This is where free speech debate enters. If the police said there was evidence of harassment, it was clearly identifiable, then there would be no discussion of free speech.
I agree, harassment shouldn't be protected by free speech. Harassment is a charge that must be proved with evidence though. Again, if you have more than what we're going on then please provide it. It would be helpful.
Whether she's defended free speech or not is irrelevant because no one is suggesting she's intentionally attacking free speech. What is being suggested is that this case has no evidence, just someone who's saying she FEELS harassed and wants someone else to pay criminally for making her feel that way(am I understanding the case correctly here?). People have all sorts of feelings triggered by all sorts of things. How does one measure a feeling and what about a feeling should see someone locked up?
The arguments I've provided has focused on a single concept, does a lack of evidence mean there is a threat to free speech should such a case rule in the accuser's favour? You've attempted to derail the discussion a couple times now calling people sexist and other things. You've suggested if a man finds a woman attractive there is something wrong with that. Should we apologize for not taking your view and providing a different perspective? Also what does it have to do with the thread?
Sent from my Note 3 using Tapatalk
Comment