Craig wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tank Standings Thread
Collapse
X
-
NoPropsneeded wrote: View PostI'd have to say overall yes. But i don't think he'll be regarded as the best to ever play unless he passes MJ's 6 championships or at least gets close to 6"Bruno?
Heh, if he is in the D-league still in a few years I will be surprised.
He's terrible."
-Superjudge, 7/23
Hope you're wrong.
Comment
-
stooley wrote: View Post4 puts him there i think. he had to drudge through 8 years of terrible cleveland management.
Comment
-
Nosike wrote: View PostLol, Magic was nowhere near LeBron defensively. You have a really bad habit of making things up.
He was actually a liability guarding opposing point guards because he didn't have anything in the realm of LeBron's level of athleticism and lateral quickness. He was average defending players his size.
LeBron on the other hand has the ability to lockdown players at 4 out of 5 positions, hell sometimes he can even guard centers.
Also remember that Magic also played positions 1-5...so I don't see how I would be "making it up"
Comment
-
OldSkoolCool wrote: View PostBecause of the fact that at 23 I'm not old enough to have seen a ton of his games (just some repeats on NBA TV canada) I am kind of relying on basketball reference DRAT for this one. In which case he is nearly as good as LeBron bouncing around that 100 mark.
Also remember that Magic also played positions 1-5...so I don't see how I would be "making it up"
Yeah he played 1-5, that doesn't mean he defended them all well.
Comment
-
-
OldSkoolCool wrote: View PostSo you're saying we should wait and see, the deadline is the only thing that takes Lowry off of the trade scene.
Comment
-
Matt52 wrote: View PostI think there is only one reason why his job his likely harder right now: LOWRY.
Matt, can you confirm? Or somebody who's into stats and stuffLast edited by TheGloveinRapsUniform; Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:57 PM.
Comment
-
Last year to drop from middle of the pack to dead lost the Magic lost 4 out of 5 games post-Christmas after playing .500 ball up to that point.
You have to go on a severe run to move multiples positions in the standings in (basically) half a season, ex. 3 out of 4 or 4 out of 5. They "we're only X number of games ahead/behind" is very misleading. This is always true, but there is minimal movement in the standings after Christmas (1-3 spots for 90% of teams). Last year the top 8 EC teams at Christmas were the 8 playoff teams at season's end, even though teams 9 and 10 were only a couple games behind the whole time.
It's not impossible, but it's highly, highly unlikely. For the Raps to lose 3 out of 4 games to ensure a top 5 pick, they'd have to unload a lot more than Lowry, imho. I don't think it's worth it anymore. The risk/reward has completely changed post-trade. There are too many good young players on solid contracts that you'd have to dump now to take a shot at maybe getting a top 5 pick (might not even get it) and then maybe landing a player who not only replaces those dumped, but improves the roster. The odds have changed, and I think it's better now to move forward with the current assets.
Playing the Wizards was a sobering reminder - three trips to the lottery, three solid (at the time) top 5 picks, some marquee signings/trades (as marquee as possible for Washington) and....they're worse than the Raps.
The tanking "step back" made plenty of sense and the odds were better while Rudy was here. The landscape's much different now."We're playing in a building." -- Kawhi Leonard
Comment
-
Matt52 wrote: View PostI think there is only one reason why his job his likely harder right now: LOWRY.
Comment
-
TheGloveinRapsUniform wrote: View PostA poster on the Raptors FB page is saying that tanking is impossible now, that for the raps to even get into the lottery, they have to win max 9 games till the end of the season.
Matt, can you confirm? Or somebody who's into stats and stuff
The numbers above are not written in stone. Just meant to be a guide to show that the "9 more wins" doesn't seem to make any sense.
Comment
Comment