well it is the nba, and hell knows they arent shy about rigging the production for profit. so, biggest blockbuster ever, with raptors as stars is released just as Toronto gets asg,they couldnt rig a draft, but, maybe they rig it anyhow.....bout time no??
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Raptors and the 2015 Draft
Collapse
X
-
I hope too, but every single workout so far has had the names announced at the last minute, with the exception of one or two names total leaking early.
Comment
-
Shantz wrote: View PostHPBasketball (Matt Moore) put out these two tweets today in reference to Aaron Gordon:
@HPbasketball: It’s weird that we assume that to play positions you MUST be able to certain things.
@HPbasketball: If 4’s are going to be shooters and playmakers, why do 3’s have to be shooters and playmakers?
I immediately thought of Rondae Hollis-Jefferson. If he had a capable jumpshot he would be towards tomhe top of the draft, and this because small forwards are supposed to be shooters.
Even if he tops out near a Kidd-Gilchrist offensively, that's still a heck of a player at 20 due to his defensive potential. Charlottes problem isn't necessarily MKG's lack of shooting, it could also be viewed as a lack of shooting around him.
Granted, Toronto isn't chock full of exceptional shooters either (although Pat-Pat stretching from the four helps a little), buts also done think that we are a good enough team to draft based on fit with any particular player on the roster.
For example, saying we need a shooter at SF because of DeMar's lack of range. We could make this decision to simply see him leave next offseason.
I still believe that if RHJ can rebuild his shot (by all accounts he is a hard worker and is already putting in the time on this area of his game) to a functional level then whoever picks him could have a scary player on their hands. Even if he doesn't though, you still walk away with a player who can contribute with specific skills.
High ceiling, high floor.
Comment
-
Lowry + Ross for 3rd Pick and a 2nd rounder ? we pick Russell and RHJ with the 20 and pick a 2rd project like Wood if he falls since he's been falling on mock drafts or even Tokoto
Russell/GV
DeRozan/???(Tokoto)
RHJ/ JJ/ Bruno
??/ PPAT(Wood)
JV/Beve
with moving Lowry and Ross we gain more cap space for this year and can sign a legit starting 4 (or 3 just put RHJ in starting because Casey hates JJ but most likely gonna be in d league or deep rotation ) and have enough cap space hopefully to sign some decent role players
Comment
-
TacoHD wrote: View PostLowry + Ross for 3rd Pick and a 2nd rounder ? we pick Russell and RHJ with the 20 and pick a 2rd project like Wood if he falls since he's been falling on mock drafts or even Tokoto
Russell/GV
DeRozan/???(Tokoto)
RHJ/ JJ/ Bruno
??/ PPAT(Wood)
JV/Beve
with moving Lowry and Ross we gain more cap space for this year and can sign a legit starting 4 (or 3 just put RHJ in starting because Casey hates JJ but most likely gonna be in d league or deep rotation ) and have enough cap space hopefully to sign some decent role players
Comment
-
TacoHD wrote: View PostLowry + Ross for 3rd Pick and a 2nd rounder ? we pick Russell and RHJ with the 20 and pick a 2rd project like Wood if he falls since he's been falling on mock drafts or even Tokoto
Russell/GV
DeRozan/???(Tokoto)
RHJ/ JJ/ Bruno
??/ PPAT(Wood)
JV/Beve
with moving Lowry and Ross we gain more cap space for this year and can sign a legit starting 4 (or 3 just put RHJ in starting because Casey hates JJ but most likely gonna be in d league or deep rotation ) and have enough cap space hopefully to sign some decent role playersin masai we trust
water covers 98% of the earth, Mitchell Robinson covers the other 2%
Comment
-
Didn't see this posted yet, but FiveThirtyEight (stats website) posted a top 50 projected +/- for the draft class (college players only), by comparing key statistical indicators to past draft classes. The fascinating thing about it is that it projects probability of a player being a star, starter, roleplayer, or bust.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...a-draft-class/
Russell, for example, is projected as being most likely to become a star in the draft, but also more likely to become a bust than any other high picks.
Amongst players possible to be available for Toronto:
Portis - (0, 25, 39, 36) - low starter probability, good roleplayer probability
Jones - (2.7, 42, 28, 27) - excellent starter probability, solid star potential
Grant - (0, 13, 35, 52) - huge bust potential
Looney - (1, 36, 38, 26) - moderately good starter probability
Hunter - (0, 15, 39, 47) - huge bust potential
RHJ - (2, 37, 39, 22) - lowest bust potential, good starter potential, sold roleplayer potential, star potential is pretty good comparitively
Vaughn - (2, 24, 37, 37) - trending towards roleplayer
Harrell - (0, 20, 41, 38) - poor starter potential
Anderson - (0, 16, 41, 43) - bust potential, low starter potential
Wright - (0, 17, 36, 47) high bust potential
Upshaw - (0, 9, 38, 53) - extremely high bust potential
Wood - (1, 31, 39, 29) - lower bust potential, okay starter potential,
D. Johnson - (2, 37, 42, 19) - big outlier, great starter/roleplayer potential, low bust potential
Alexander - (1, 29, 41, 29) - another guy who does pretty well in this projection compared to mocks
If you were placing much value in this, there's a few clear tiers in the above list:
Jones, Looney, RHJ, Wood, and Johnson all have star potential of 1% or above, starter potential in the 30% or above, and bust potential below 30%.
Portis, Vaughn, Harrell, Alexander all have middling scores with starter potential if the 20-30% range, and bust potential in the 30-40% range (slightly power for Alexander)
Grant, Hunter, Anderson, Wright, Upshaw all have starter potential of less than 20%, and bust potential in the 40% or greater range.Last edited by octothorp; Sat Jun 20, 2015, 10:43 PM.
Comment
-
octothorp wrote: View PostDidn't see this posted yet, but FiveThirtyEight (stats website) posted a top 50 projected +/- for the draft class (college players only), by comparing key statistical indicators to past draft classes. The fascinating thing about it is that it projects probability of a player being a star, starter, roleplayer, or bust.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...a-draft-class/
Russell, for example, is projected as being most likely to become a star in the draft, but also more likely to become a bust than any other high picks.
Amongst players possible to be available for Toronto:
Portis - (0, 25, 39, 36) - low starter probability, good roleplayer probability
Jones - (2.7, 42, 28, 27) - excellent starter probability, solid star potential
Grant - (0, 13, 35, 52) - huge bust potential
Looney - (1, 36, 38, 26) - moderately good starter probability
Hunter - (0, 15, 39, 47) - huge bust potential
RHJ - (2, 37, 39, 22) - lowest bust potential, good starter potential, sold roleplayer potential, star potential is pretty good comparitively
Vaughn - (2, 24, 37, 37) - trending towards roleplayer
Harrell - (0, 20, 41, 38) - poor starter potential
Anderson - (0, 16, 41, 43) - bust potential, low starter potential
Wright - (0, 17, 36, 47) high bust potential
Upshaw - (0, 9, 38, 53) - extremely high bust potential
Wood - (1, 31, 39, 29) - lower bust potential, okay starter potential,
D. Johnson - (2, 37, 42, 19) - big outlier, great starter/roleplayer potential, low bust potential
Alexander - (1, 29, 41, 29) - another guy who does pretty well in this projection compared to mocks
If you were placing much value in this, there's a few clear tiers in the above list:
Jones, Looney, RHJ, Wood, and Johnson all have star potential of 1% or above, starter potential in the 30% or above, and bust potential below 30%.
Portis, Vaughn, Harrell, Alexander all have middling scores with starter potential if the 20-30% range, and bust potential in the 30-40% range (slightly power for Alexander)
Grant, Hunter, Anderson, Wright, Upshaw all have starter potential of less than 20%, and bust potential in the 40% or greater range."My biggest concern as a coach is to not confuse winning with progress." - Steve Kerr
"If it's unacceptable in defeat, it's unacceptable in victory." - Jeff Van Gundy
Comment
-
Bonus Jonas wrote: View PostHow crazy would it be if they put the names out and it's Mudiay, Winslow, WCS and Porzingis.
Pretty sure this forum would go insane
But really, those players would not come in for the workout - not individually and absolutely not as a group...and if you've made a deal to trade up for a pick I'm pretty sure you should already know who you want to take.Two beer away from being two beers away.
Comment
Comment