bryan colangelo wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Game #28: Toronto Raptors 118 - New York Knicks 108
Collapse
X
-
iblastoff wrote: View Postif fields somehow got us from something like #19 in the league up to #11, then by all means lets just keep that going then. we're clearly still scoring just fine.
we're still #2 in offense. we havent dropped off at all despite derozan gone.
I wonder if they didn't have a bit of too-much-success-entitlement. Defense is all effort and attention to detail, and they may have been thinking they were good enough to not put the effort and work in to the same degree they were last year. A stretch of awful defensive games + the Fields change may have been enough of a wake-up call.
Leave a comment:
-
bryan colangelo wrote: View PostI think we all agree the downgrade in defense from DeRozan to GV is way bigger than we thought. And Terence Ross is actually horrible at defending his position.
In other words, a lot of people on the board were underrating DeRozan's defense. Even if he isn't a stopper at least he knows what he's supposed to be doing, and he's stronger and more reliable than Ross. When he comes back Derozan should probably be guarding 3's.
Leave a comment:
-
I have no idea why DC stuck with Hansbrough when both Aldridge and Wear were on the court. He couldn't defend or rebound against them. I thought Hayes or Stiemsma should've been used in his place. I hope DC isn't as stubborn against Chicago's large frontcourt.
Leave a comment:
-
bryan colangelo wrote: View PostI think we all agree the downgrade in defense from DeRozan to GV is way bigger than we thought. And Terence Ross is actually horrible at defending his position.
In other words, a lot of people on the board were underrating DeRozan's defense. Even if he isn't a stopper at least he knows what he's supposed to be doing, and he's stronger and more reliable than Ross. When he comes back Derozan should probably be guarding 3's.
Getting Lou and JJ this year has really helped to mask Vasquez weaknesses on both sides of the floor when we play our normal second unit (e.g. PP, JJ, Lou, GV, TH).
Leave a comment:
-
stooley wrote: View PostDid anyone see Greivis' post game interview? Kinda sounded like Casey's on their case about what they say to the media and how they approach each game.
He caught himself talking about the road trip and was like, oops, my mistake, tomorrow's game is all we're thinking about.
Leave a comment:
-
Did anyone see Greivis' post game interview? Kinda sounded like Casey's on their case about what they say to the media and how they approach each game.
He caught himself talking about the road trip and was like, oops, my mistake, tomorrow's game is all we're thinking about.
Leave a comment:
-
bryan colangelo wrote: View PostI think we all agree the downgrade in defense from DeRozan to GV is way bigger than we thought. And Terence Ross is actually horrible at defending his position.
In other words, a lot of people on the board were underrating DeRozan's defense. Even if he isn't a stopper at least he knows what he's supposed to be doing, and he's stronger and more reliable than Ross. When he comes back Derozan should probably be guarding 3's.
Leave a comment:
-
iblastoff wrote: View PostWell overall we've climbed back to near top 10 in defense again (we're at 11th in the league now) without derozan for whatever that's worth.
It's good to know though the Raptors can rest Derozan earlier and play Ross at the two, and slow down big 3s with Fields and JJ. Or alternatively, play Ross less minutes (Derozan is still much better at drawing fouls and playmaking than Ross). It gives Casey tons of options.
And honestly, if the Raps can perform well with JJ or Fields at the 3 it kinds of makes Ross expendable ... trade bait, perhaps?Last edited by bryan colangelo; Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:13 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
iblastoff wrote: View Postif fields somehow got us from something like #19 in the league up to #11, then by all means lets just keep that going then. we're clearly still scoring just fine.
we're still #2 in offense. we havent dropped off at all despite derozan gone.
It's not really anything Nothing to do with derozN being out/in. We still would've succumbed to the norm. (Top 10 defence) but it's easier to just say fields was the answer, because, hey, doode is a pretty good defender.
Leave a comment:
-
I blame our defensive woes on GV being a starter and not because DeMar wasn't. I'm a bit more pleased however there is still a lot of improvement that can be made. Knicks did score 108 points and they average about 94. The night before, Detroit scored 100 when they average about 94 as well.
Leave a comment:
-
Yabadabayolo wrote: View PostBut you have to consider the all d no offence fields being inserted into the starting lineup. For what it's worth
we're still #2 in offense. we havent dropped off at all despite derozan gone.
Leave a comment:
-
iblastoff wrote: View PostWell overall we've climbed back to near top 10 in defense again (we're at 11th in the league now) without derozan for whatever that's worth.
Leave a comment:
-
iblastoff wrote: View PostWell overall we've climbed back to near top 10 in defense again (we're at 11th in the league now) without derozan for whatever that's worth.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: