JWash wrote:
View Post
THis asset is an impending free agent that is going to be requiring a MASSIVE upgrade in pay. If said talent was available at his current rate for the next 3 years then fine your logic is more sound.
Keeping said asset for 25 ish million, then how do you aquire the star, you keep saying via trade, but provide nothing in terms of possibilities of that happening. And if you could find a suitor for a "superstar" then you would absolutely need to gut most of the good peices of the roster leaving you with a superstar and a subpar supporting cast.
And by your own words he is the 5th best shooting guard(arguable with Giannis and Oladipo on the rise) in what is without doubt by far the weakest position in the league (league has been shifting to sg being filled with specialty guys that fill a specifc need ie: 3D, look at all the top teams over last 10 years....) because he is better than others at his own position? that is Isaih Thomas type managing.
BUT.......
This all is in jest, because the real question being posed that you have been skirting for some time is how do you get a hypotheical to come here with said gutted roster in a signing, or win with a gutted team over sacrificing Demar in an effort to land him.
You said yourself, multiple times, that without offering a superstar to play with Demar they would all turn that down, but continue to dodge answering how a team with a gutted bench, and 2/3 starters gone if more attractive than playing with ALL of lowry/jv/carrol and most of the bench?
Comment