Why do we need to tailor the offense entirely around JV though, why not offense by committee with several different points of attack?
I kind of thought our whole issue is that our offense isn't diversified enough so when Lowry or DD or both have a bad game we're screwed. Focusing everything on JV doesn't really fix that. However giving each guy around 20 shots per 100 possessions (like the Pistons in 2004 with Sheed, Billups and Rip) would give us a more varied attack that could sustain 1 or even 2 guys having a bad night.
I kind of thought our whole issue is that our offense isn't diversified enough so when Lowry or DD or both have a bad game we're screwed. Focusing everything on JV doesn't really fix that. However giving each guy around 20 shots per 100 possessions (like the Pistons in 2004 with Sheed, Billups and Rip) would give us a more varied attack that could sustain 1 or even 2 guys having a bad night.
Comment