The whole concept of Alf depending on RGIII has been well known in fantasy circles for years. Here's some old articles on the relationship:
May 30, 2013:
http://www.hogshaven.com/2013/5/30/4...-alfred-morris
November 2, 2014:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...g-game-better/
And a really detailed one here:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...alfred-morris/
If you go there it really goes into it in high detail.
May 30, 2013:
It's clear that Alfred Morris benefited from Robert Griffin III in the backfield. How much did that help? Like many before him, he benefited from both the zone-blocking scheme and stretch plays. He benefited from the pistol, the option and the triple-option. Was it his talent that earned those numbers or the fact that defenses in the NFL weren't prepared for this type of offense? Would Morris have gained as many yards if we didn't have a running threat at the QB position? RG3 kept backside defenders occupied on stretch plays and optimized Alfred's running opportunities on option plays by giving him the ball when the defender they "optioned" stayed with the quarterback.
November 2, 2014:
In Sunday’s game against Minnesota, he had 55 yards on 10 carries (plus a score) with more than nine minutes to go in the first half. The reason? Robert Griffin III was back under center.
In games with Griffin, Morris has rushed for 91.2 yards per game, averaging 4.9 yards per carry. In those game without Griffin, well, not as good.
In games with Griffin, Morris has rushed for 91.2 yards per game, averaging 4.9 yards per carry. In those game without Griffin, well, not as good.
And a really detailed one here:
Entering the game against the Vikings on Sunday, Alfred Morris had been averaging 3.9 yards per carry, down from his 4.8 yards per carry average in his rookie campaign and 4.6 last season. With Robert Griffin III returning from his dislocated ankle, the threat of the quarterback running on the read-option was re-established and Morris benefited. Morris bounced back to his rookie season average of 4.8 yards per carry against the Vikings, taking 19 carries for 92 yards and two touchdowns.
So just how much did Griffin’s return impact Morris in the run game? The threat of his legs kept the backside contain defender from chasing down the run, giving Morris more time and more cutback opportunities. With the read-option, the Redskins were able to leave that backside contain defender unblocked and had an extra blocker to the front-side of the run.
So just how much did Griffin’s return impact Morris in the run game? The threat of his legs kept the backside contain defender from chasing down the run, giving Morris more time and more cutback opportunities. With the read-option, the Redskins were able to leave that backside contain defender unblocked and had an extra blocker to the front-side of the run.
If you go there it really goes into it in high detail.
Comment