slaw wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything Playoffs 2024
Collapse
X
-
DanH wrote: View Post
I mean, pushing that Celtics series to 7 was impressive on its own after having hobbled core players led to the deficit we were in.
And the 76ers were not good this year. Not sure how that's so hard to wrap your head around. Already discussed elevating a less good roster to heights they don't deserve.
It's really not a meaningless criterion. We see over and over again coaches who have rosters just littered with stars AND depth and they can't coach their way out of a paper bag, losing to lesser opponents or getting blasted when they should at least put up a fight.
"Cherry pick the good." It's called being realistic about what coaches can do. Spoelstra didn't exactly drag the Heat to the ECF without Butler.
And the Knicks missing Randle are somehow a good team, but the Sixers having Embiid and Maxey are not? I thought high-end talent is what wins in the playoffs. Nurse had that, plus he didn't trust his bench (nothing changes).
And nobody ever puts Butler in the same category as legit MVPs, yet Spo has helped him to beat guys like Giannis and Tatum in the playoffs, because guys like Duncan Robinson, Jae Crowder, Caleb Martin, Gabe Vincent and Butler himself punch above their weight. Not always, but at least Spo demonstrates the ability to coach up, way more often than Nurse. Again, Nurse has zero... yes, zero, playoff success since Kawhi left. That's elite?
Comment
-
MixxAOR wrote: View Post
Just looking for scapegoats. The reason they get fired is not "tactical" or some other reason but more personality crashing.
A coach is like a COO. Can you get by with a bad COO if your company is a finely tuned machine? For sure. For awhile. But as the assets change, age out, competitors catch up, etc. that bad COO will not offer much of anything to help your company. You want a good COO not because he's more important than the business itself but because he can help you get the most out of the business you have and also help you create the business you want.
So, yeah, if your business stinks the best COO in the world isn't going to make it Apple or Amazon but if you have a decent business you want to get the most out of then hiring the right COO is pretty important. You also want the right guy at the right time. Not every good COO is the right COO for that particular company based on experience, skillset, personality, etc.
Teams aren't spending tens of millions on analytics and player development because coaching is irrelevant or immaterial - they are doing it to try and get the most out of the team they have.
- 1 like
Comment
-
The Claw Reborn wrote: View Post
I am curious why you always have the axe to grind with certain posters like golden and I am not excluded from this special attention from you, always going out of your busy day to start a rabbit hole of a discussion.
Yet people (I can pinpoint two) with strongest opinions about this particular topic regarding this “coaching does not matter shit” you seem to find away to go around it. Haha.
It’s not necessarily golden arguing about coaching matters in general but more about Nurse as a coach which we already know he will always not a big fan of that guy.
- 1 like
Comment
-
slaw wrote: View Post
You're not paying tens of millions for a scapegoat.
A coach is like a COO. Can you get by with a bad COO if your company is a finely tuned machine? For sure. For awhile. But as the assets change, age out, competitors catch up, etc. that bad COO will not offer much of anything to help your company. You want a good COO not because he's more important than the business itself but because he can help you get the most out of the business you have and also help you create the business you want.
So, yeah, if your business stinks the best COO in the world isn't going to make it Apple or Amazon but if you have a decent business you want to get the most out of then hiring the right COO is pretty important. You also want the right guy at the right time. Not every good COO is the right COO for that particular company based on experience, skillset, personality, etc.
Teams aren't spending tens of millions on analytics and player development because coaching is irrelevant or immaterial - they are doing it to try and get the most out of the team they have.Only one thing matters: We The Champs.
Comment
-
JawsGT wrote: View PostCoaching is about fit too though. Sometimes its just how they mesh with their stars.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Only 2 teams had a worse DRB% than the Raptors - one was the Wiz. The other was OKC. Dallas is killing them on the glass again. They sure could use a Drummond or JV in free agency next year. Draft Edey???.
If we knew half as much about coaching an NBA team as we think, we"d know twice as much as we do.
Comment
-
The Great One wrote: View PostWashington is shooting the ball like he's Glen Rice.To be the champs you got to beat the champs
Comment
Comment