psrs1 wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How much have we improved?
Collapse
X
-
Two beer away from being two beers away.
-
Mess wrote: View PostWe won't be chucking quite as much in the regular season I'd have to assume.
But still, take the preseason stats and give 5-8 more minutes to Lowry with same or improved %, 8-10 more for Norm with a slightly improved % and 10 more for Ibaka with improved % (all 3 likely) and that will raise the overall average a good chunk. Even when you figure in Miles not hitting 50%.
Those 4 players took 50% of the 3's in preseason and you can assume their piece of the pie will only get bigger.
Comment
-
Scraptor wrote: View PostWe shot 32.6% from 3 this preseason, 6th worst among NBA teams. However, we made the second most, because we attempted the second most, after the Rockets.
Given that we only shot 37.7% from mid-range last year, even making 32.6% of threes is going to be more efficient. Question is whether we stick to the game plan once other teams begin adjusting their defensive strategies after scouting us, or if we revert back to old habits.
If the threes are replacing mid and long twos, I'd think anything over 30% will be an improvement. And that's not even going into opening the floor for drives + inside scoring. All that interior space was beautiful to see at times during the preseason, very good for driving guards + for JV."We're playing in a building." -- Kawhi Leonard
Comment
-
Jclaw wrote: View PostCan't believe the disrespect I'm seeing across several preseason rankings. Well, I can...because Raptors. Can't wait to see the team prove them wrong. Then they'll say it doesn't matter because wait until the playoffs.
Comment
-
Nilanka wrote: View PostSorta glad it's happening, to be honest. This team tends to play better with a chip on their shoulder. When they think they're good, that's when the Wizards sweep us in embarrassing fashion.For still frame photograph of me reading the DeRozan thread please refer to my avatar
Comment
-
These should be the big minutes played changes from last season.
Carroll to Miles (~1800 mins)
Patterson to Ibaka (~1600)
Ross to Powell (~1500)
Joseph to Wright (~1500)
Tucker was great, but didn't play many minutes.
Those are generally considered improvements. NBA.com ranked us in the top 10 in Offseason moves.
But, I googled "nba 2017-18 win predictions" and these are the top five results
48.5 Westgate Las Vegas SuperBook
48.8 cbssports.com
47.0 bleacherreport
47.5 sportsinsights.com
46.5 fansided.com
ESPN - which rated our offseason as "B" - had us even worse at 43.4. Those are big declines for a team that averaged 53.5 wins the last two seasons, despite starting Scola and Siakam and our All-Star point guard missing a lot of games last year.
What gives? We spent a lot of money and gave up a bunch of draft picks to restructure the team. Why are we not projected to win a lot more games? Including by voters here.
What was the point in the signings and giving up draft picks if the team is supposed to win less games?
I don't think Carroll and Patterson were nearly as bad as most others do. But, I still think we should win at least 55 games, hopefully 60.Last edited by BrieflySpeaking; Thu Oct 19, 2017, 03:55 PM.
Comment
-
BrieflySpeaking wrote: View PostThese should be the big minutes played changes from last season.
Carroll to Miles (~1800 mins)
Patterson to Ibaka (~1600)
Ross to Powell (~1500)
Joseph to Wright (~1500)
Tucker was great, but didn't play many minutes.
Those are generally considered improvements. NBA.com ranked us in the top 10 in Offseason moves.
But, I googled "nba 2017-18 win predictions" and these are the top five results
48.5 Westgate Las Vegas SuperBook
48.8 cbssports.com
47.0 bleacherreport
47.5 sportsinsights.com
46.5 fansided.com
ESPN - which rated our offseason as "B" - had us even worse at 43.4. Those are big declines for a team that averaged 53.5 wins the last two seasons, despite starting Scola and Siakam and our All-Star point guard missing a lot of games last year.
What gives? We spent a lot of money and gave up a bunch of draft picks to restructure the team. Why are we not projected to win a lot more games?
Including by voters here. What was the point in the signings and giving up draft picks if the team is supposed to win less games?
I don't think Carroll and Patterson were nearly as bad as most others do. But, I still think we should win at least 55 games, hopefully 60.The name's Bond, James Bond.
Comment
Comment