slaw wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
#FireCasey
Collapse
X
-
Uncle_Si wrote: View PostI'm done. I can't take it anymore. This team isn't good defensively and is a train wreck on O. DD and Casey must go. DD isn't a championship type player. He's a delusional Kobe Bryant and Casey is just delusional.
Who wouldn't do a DD for Randle trade? With pieces to make it work.
Front court of mirotic\carroll/jv.......shutter.....just awesome
Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk
Comment
-
golden wrote: View PostThe question is: WHY are those guys liabilities on the floor this season at this particular time, when they have all previously played good-to-great for extended periods in well defined roles.
But Patterson has the 5th best on-court net rating on the team, at +4. Johnson has the second best, at +10, just behind JV.
The big questions to ask in terms of leveraging effectiveness are: why do we play a starting lineup that doesn't fit together so many minutes? And why do we play Biyombo, who is so ineffective a) so many minutes and b) with so many other defence-first players, exaggerating his ineffectiveness.
Comment
-
-
OldSkoolCool wrote: View PostI only agree because I think Lakers management has gone full retard
Comment
-
Primer wrote: View PostRandle isn't that good. Had him on my fantasy team and had to drop him due to horrible % and doesn't do anything but score and rebound. DD would be the heir apparent to Kobe. Lakers do that trade in a heartbeat.
Comment
-
golden wrote: View PostHow much of that is situational, i.e., Byron Scott, Kobe and a generally dysfunctional organization? Randle is really just 10+ games into his NBA career. He did look great in a few pre-season games, I saw, but haven't watched him recently. Powerful quick, great finisher, good handle for his size and decent passer. Seems like he has some tools to work with to be pretty good with the right development.
Comment
-
OldSkoolCool wrote: View PostI would take Russell over Randle if it were on the table every day of the week
MU pick up the phoneSunny ways my friends, sunny ways
Because its 2015
Comment
-
DanH wrote: View PostThe big questions to ask in terms of leveraging effectiveness are: why do we play a starting lineup that doesn't fit together so many minutes? And why do we play Biyombo, who is so ineffective a) so many minutes and b) with so many other defence-first players, exaggerating his ineffectiveness.
Comment
-
Russell is indeed crazy talented, but the Lakers trade Randle 10 times before they trade Russell. No such offer would exists - you'd be extremely lucky to get them to talk DD for Randle, let alone even consider moving Russell.
Comment
-
raptors999 wrote: View PostIf Lakers would trade Randle stright up for Demar thats a good deal. If they didnt take Russell it would be good for both sides. Lakers fans are used to Kobe anyway
Comment
Comment