Shaqs ego is ridiculous
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything 2024 Draft
Collapse
X
-
Primer wrote: View Post
This is nonsense, they are outliers and draft position correlates extremely well with NBA success. There are WAY more NBA All Stars selected in the lotto than the 2nd round, despite the 2nd round having more than double the amount of draft picks.
Can you find a star in the 2nd round? Sure.
Are you more likely to find a star in the lotto? YES!
We're talking about some mythical BPA list that's supposedly available to NBA GMs when it's time for them to draft at whatever position they are at. The precise ranking is important, because that's when you miss out on franchise altering talent and spark those "what if" debates that never end.
Ranking & projecting that talent properly is what you'd think pro scouts who missed out on: Kobe, Nash, Dirk, Giannis, Jokic, Gasol, Manu, Butler, Siakam, Curry, Klay, Draymond, Gobert, etc..., etc..., etc..., should be getting paid for.
- 1 like
Comment
-
If Edey is available at 31, sure you can kick it around. I’m sure the Raps will work him out regardless. And they’ll have the information they need. If they take him you know they are doing it for the right reasons, not because he’s Canadian.
If they do keep the top 6 then there’s a few players that are interesting, I like Ja’Kobe and Cody Williams so far, still have to do a bunch research.
I like Tyler Smith, Ware, and McCain so far at 15-17
31… who knows right now, DaRon Holmes, Koleck, DaSilva, and Edey all looked good this weekend.
Comment
-
golden wrote: View Post
Not talking comparing about lotto picks vs. 2nd round as an aggregate.
We're talking about some mythical BPA list that's supposedly available to NBA GMs when it's time for them to draft at whatever position they are at. The precise ranking is important, because that's when you miss out on franchise altering talent and spark those "what if" debates that never
- 1 like
Comment
-
-
WJF wrote: View Post
What if with our two first round picks we take a big wing and a point guard? That leaves back up big as a target, does it not? Edey if still in the board would have to be considered.
Comche, Ware, Missi, Edeya couple of those guys are going to still be there. Who does the team like?
The chances of them picking in the top 6 though is still slim. People keeps forgetting that.Mamba Mentality
Comment
-
saints91 wrote: View Post
Every team makes their own list by ranking all the players. So every teams BPA list is different, I’m sure there’s some players that land in the same slot on most teams boards but teams and scouts value different skills. Like Scottie was 4th on the Raps list but what other teams did?
Now, I do get the idea of drafting who you think is the most talented player, regardless of fit. For example, if you already have a franchise PG, then don't be afraid to draft another PG if you think he's the most talented guy on the board. Most obvious example is that you don't avoid drafting Luka and picking Marvin Bagley, because you think he fits better with D'Aaron Fox. And if there were any pro scouts who ranked Bagley over Luka in the talent department, then that's a good argument that pre-draft pro scouts are pretty useless (hint: there were lots of them).
Comment
-
Joey wrote: View Post
It absolutely is different. Contracts are not guaranteed. And if back up to Quick is a NEED, then why would we not use one of our earlier 2 picks to get a more "sure thing" to fill said NEED. Why are we waiting until the 2nd round to do so?
You guys are talking like we're guaranteed to be picking in the top 6.
Mamba Mentality
Comment
-
The Great One wrote: View PostBecause we have ONE guaranteed first round pick. The best players that are available in the mid 1st round are mostly wingers. Collier could drop to us but I'm not a fan of him.
You guys are talking like they're guaranteed to be picking in the top 6.
I mean, you don't know what players will be available mid 1st round, but you sure seem damn certain in your statement.. it's how it is.
- 1 like
Comment
-
golden wrote: View Post
Not talking comparing about lotto picks vs. 2nd round as an aggregate.
We're talking about some mythical BPA list that's supposedly available to NBA GMs when it's time for them to draft at whatever position they are at. The precise ranking is important, because that's when you miss out on franchise altering talent and spark those "what if" debates that never end.
Ranking & projecting that talent properly is what you'd think pro scouts who missed out on: Kobe, Nash, Dirk, Giannis, Jokic, Gasol, Manu, Butler, Siakam, Curry, Klay, Draymond, Gobert, etc..., etc..., etc..., should be getting paid for.Last edited by Primer; Mon Mar 25, 2024, 06:32 PM.
Comment
-
Joey wrote: View Post
I mean, yes, some assumptions need to be made to go down any discussion path we as lowly internet dwellers need to go down ... it's a forum, that's not exactly unheard of. Lol
I mean, even you don't KNOW what players will be available mid 1st round, but you sure seem DAMN certain.
I'll revisit this again if they somehow end up picking in the top 6.
Right now, as far as I'm concerned, the only 1st round pick they have is the Pacers pick.Mamba Mentality
- 1 like
Comment
-
Joey wrote: View Post
Which was exactly my point about using our lotto pick to fill the NEEDs we supposedly have, rather than waiting til the 2nd round to fill those NEEDS.
Comment
-
Primer wrote: View Post
In aggregate the scouts do exactly that, they predict the better players way above chance. Because they're not infallible you discount the entire profession. Outliers are exactly that, outliers. Scouts aren't omniscient but if you use their rankings you are far more likely to select the best player available than if you just pulled a name out of a hat.
That to say, top end of the Draft I would agree with you. Rankings work. But once in you're in the 2nd round, it really truly is crap shoot.
I think you are almost just as likely to score with a 31st pick as you are the 60th pick.
Comment
Comment